Carlos Yammon Pena v. State

HILL, Justice.

[T1] After a jury convicted Carlos Pefia of larceny, the district court revoked his probation from a previous case. In this consolidated appeal, Mr. Pefia argues that his probation from the previous case should not have been revoked while the instant case was still pending appeal. Regarding the instant larceny case, Mr. Pefia argues that during trial, the district court should not have allowed a jury instruction that improperly shifted the burden of proof to Mr. Pefia and asserts that there was insufficient evidence to convict him in that there was no evidence that he moved or…