Legal Opinion

Granzer v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 2008No. S-08-0010PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KITE, Justice.

[T1] Sally Jo Granzer challenges her conviction for endangering a child by knowingly and willfully allowing her to enter and remain in a dwelling where Ms. Granzer knew methamphetamine was stored. She argues that the jury was not instructed properly on the "enter" element of the crime and that there was insufficient evidence that methamphetamine was stored in the dwelling. We conclude that Ms. Granzer is entitled to a new trial because the jury was instructed improperly and she was prejudiced by the improper instruction. The trial evidence on the "store" element was, however,…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Miranda Rose Mraz v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Smith v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Sam v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Richard Cameron WilkersonWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Schmuck v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2017

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API