Boyd v. Bargagliotti
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Mendocino County, and from an order denying a new trial. Thos. C. Denny, Judge, presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
By the terms of a certain contract entered into by and between the parties on the seventeenth day of September, 1906, the plaintiff and one J. L. Hughes agreed to construct for the appellant a bridge across Russian river, near the town of Pieta, in Mendocino county, for the sum of $575. Said contract, although made on the seventeenth day of Sep tember, 1906, was not signed by the parties until the thirteenth day of October of said year. By the contract, however, the defendant agreed to furnish all the materials with which said bridge was to be built, and to place the same on the bridge site,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Castagnino v. BallettaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Adams v. BurbankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Reynolds v. JourdanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856
- Porter v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
- Jacob v. KetchamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Sessions v. Pacific Improvement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1922
- Lesser Towers, Inc. v. Roscoe-Ajax Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1969
- Miller v. McLaglenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Trollope v. JeffriesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Ulene v. Murray Millman of California, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1959
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.