Legal Opinion
Ulene v. Murray Millman of California, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 30, 1959No. Civ. 24073PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHerndon, J.
This is an appeal from an order confirming an arbitrator’s award. The question presented is whether the award should be vacated because (1) it was beyond the scope of the arbitrator’s authority, (2) it was imperfectly executed so as not to be mutual, final and definite, or (3) it was the product of the arbitrator’s misconduct and personal interest.
The facts are as follows: Appellant, hereinafter referred to as the “Company,” is a manufacturer of ladies’ dresses. On February 15, 1957, it entered into a collective bargaining agreement with respondent, the Los Angeles Dress and Sportswear Joint…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Sapp v. BarenfeldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Griffith Co. v. San Diego College for WomenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Crofoot v. Blair Holdings Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1953
- Pacific Vegetable Oil Corp. v. C.S.T., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1946
- O'MALLEY v. Petroleum Maintenance Co.California Supreme Court · 1957
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Lesser Towers, Inc. v. Roscoe-Ajax Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1969
- Thibodeau v. CrumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Jones v. KvistadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Trollope v. JeffriesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.