Chastain v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MAUS, Judge.
Movant was jury convicted of burglary in the second degree. He was sentenced to imprisonment for seven years. He filed a Notice of Appeal to this court. Six months later the appeal was dismissed because nothing had been done to preserve or perfect the appeal. In this proceeding he seeks relief by his amended motion under Rule 27.26.
That claim for relief is based upon allegations of ineffective assistance of appointed counsel contrary to the Sixth Amendment. The ineffective assistance pleaded included his counsel’s failure to perfect and present the appeal that had been requested…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Commonwealth v. McClendonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Camillo v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
- Schlup v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
- Buskuehl v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
- Collins v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
- McCain v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.