Legal Opinion

Camillo v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 19, 1988No. WD 39650PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GAITAN, Judge.

Appellant, John Joseph Camillo, appeals from the denial after an evidentiary hearing of his Rule 27.26 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

Appellant was tried and convicted by a jury of two counts of arson in the second degree in violation of § 569.050, RSMo. He received consecutive terms of 10 years on each count. His appeal from that conviction was affirmed by this Court in State v. Camillo, 694 S.W.2d 517 (Mo.App.1985).

On October 28, 1985, appellant filed a motion to vacate sentence under Missouri Supreme Court Rule 27.26. On April 16, 1986, a supplemental motion was…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Seales v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  3. State v. TurnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1981
  4. Hemphill v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  5. Hogshooter v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Mallett v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  2. State v. RedmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
  3. State v. FractionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. State v. SilasMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Lytle v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API