Legal Opinion

Buskuehl v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 12, 1986No. 50941PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAROHL, Judge.

Movant appeals denial of post-conviction relief based on claims of ineffective assistance of counsel at trial and on direct appeal in defense of the charge of Assault First Degree as a violation of § 565.050 RSMo 1978. After a hearing the motion court denied relief on the basis of comprehensive findings of fact and conclusions of law. The direct appeal was decided in State v. Buskuehl, 626 S.W.2d 651 (Mo.App.1981).

Appellant’s rule 27.26 motion alleges ineffective assistance of trial counsel for failure to request submission or object to failure to submit lesser included offenses…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Seales v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  3. Hemphill v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  4. Love v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  5. Leigh v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mallett v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  2. Ball v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Mallett v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  4. State of New Hampshire v. Sean BrownSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API