Legal Opinion

Frady v. Groves Thread/General Accident Ins.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 16, 1982No. 8110IC1006PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

Plaintiff was born in 1926 and began working in textile mills at the age of seventeen. For the next 23 years, he worked almost exclusively for Textiles, Inc., in the twisting departments of various cotton mills. In 1966, plaintiff was employed by defendant Groves Thread Company, another cotton processor, and worked as a twisting department employee for about six months during the period between 4 November 1966 and 2 August 1967. For the next six years, plaintiff was employed by defendant United Spinners Company, a synthetics processor.

While plaintiff had begun to experience…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hansel v. Sherman TextilesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Morrison v. Burlington IndustriesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Watkins v. Central Motor Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. Haynes v. . Feldspar Producing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  5. Little v. Anson County Schools Food ServiceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Moore v. Standard Mineral Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  2. Harrell v. Harriet & Henderson YarnCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Caulder v. Waverly MillsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  4. City of Durham v. Safety National Casualty Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  5. Armstrong v. W.R. Grace Co.North Carolina Industrial Commission · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API