Legal Opinion
Pesce v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control
California Supreme Court
Decided December 12, 1958No. S. F. 19959PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court, Alameda County, ordering a writ of mandate directing the Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board to set aside its order dismissing the petitioner’s appeal from a decision of the department.
The question presented is whether section 1013 of the Code of Civil Procedure applies to extend the 40 day period prescribed by section 23081 of the Business and Professions Code for taking an appeal from a decision of the department.
The facts are undisputed. On July 25,1956, the department rendered a decision recommending that the petitioner’s…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Estate of Hanley v. HanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- In Re PorterfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- People v. SlobodionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Armenta v. ChurchillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Gillespie v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Sacramento Newspaper Guild, Local 92 v. Sacramento County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Hollywood Circle, Inc. v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Pacific Motor Transport Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- American Friends Service Committee v. ProcunierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- California Grape & Tree Fruit League v. Industrial Welfare CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.