Legal Opinion

Wall v. Hunter

California Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 1921No. L. A. No. 6429PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLawlor, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment against plaintiff, Sarah J. Wall, and in favor of the defendants, dismissing the action because of the failure of plaintiff to file an undertaking securing the payment of costs, as required by section 1036 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The action was for damages in the sum of one hundred thousand dollars for the alienation of the affections of plaintiff’s husband, Thomas D. Wall. Service of summons was only made on the defendants J. George Hunter and A. H. Winder, although one John J. Wall was a party defendant. The complaint was filed on August 19, 1919. A…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Smith v. JaccardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  2. Marcucci v. VowinckelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Boling v. AltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  4. In Re Estate of FaberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Lang v. Lilley & Thurston Co.California Supreme Court · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Thompson v. KecklerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Anderson v. Standard Lumber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1923
  3. Estate of RobersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API