Legal Opinion
Brown v. Hornstein
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided January 4, 1996No. 94-CV-1129PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHWELB, Associate Judge:
On July 26,1994, following a non-evidentia-ry hearing, the trial court granted the motion of Jayne Hornstein (Landlord) to enforce a settlement agreement in a suit for possession brought by Ms. Hornstein against Shirley Brown (Tenant). The court entered judgment of possession in favor of Landlord. On appeal, Tenant contends that enforcement of the agreement deprived her of rights protected by the “tenant opportunity to purchase” statute (TOTPS). See D.C.Code §§ 45-1681 to -1642 (1990). We disagree and affirm.
I
On December 30,1990, the parties entered into a residential…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Grimes v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Ward v. Deavers Young v. WardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
- Lazorcak v. FeuersteinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Sheetz v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Brown v. Gesellschaft Fur Drahtlose Telegraphie, M. B. H.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Thorn v. WalkerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- Smith v. Wells Fargo BankDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Klayman v. Judicial Watch, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Sununu v. PHILIPPINE AIRLINES, INC.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Wright v. Thomas D. Walsh, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.