Legal Opinion

Winesett v. Scheidt

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 15, 1954No. 120PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDevin, C. J.

The appeal of the Commissioner of Motor Yehicles presents for decision the question whether the record that the petitioner in a local court in Pasquotank County had entered a plea of nolo contendere to the charge of driving a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor was alone satisfactory evidence in a hearing before the Commissioner under G.S. 20-16, and authorized the Commissioner to .suspend his driver’s license and to deny his plea for its return.

The statutes regulating the operation of motor vehicles on the highways created the Department of Motor Vehicles and gave…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. In Re Revocation of License to Operate a Motor Vehicle of WrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  2. State v. CooperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. State v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. In Re StiersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  5. State v. . BurnettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. HoldenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  2. State v. KerleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. Fox v. ScheidtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. State v. StoneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  5. North Carolina State Bar v. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API