United States v. Roberts
U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
FREYER, Judge:
The appellant, who at all relevant times has been lawfully married to, but living physically apart from, his spouse, without a legal separation, stands convicted of attempted wrongful appropriation of the difference between basic allowance for quarters (BAQ) at the single rate and BAQ at *820the “with dependents” rate for having received BAQ at the latter rate whilé providing no support to his “dependent” wife.
The military judge determined that the appellant had properly listed his lawful wife as a “dependent” in his naval records and ruled that, under the statutory and regulatory…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. ThomasUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
- United States v. AllenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
- United States v. JonesU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988
- United States v. MeeksU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1991
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. RiddleCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
- United States v. MosleyU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1992
- United States v. TatumU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1992
- United States v. BostU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1992
- United States v. EvansU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.