United States v. Thomas
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
Kilday, Judge:
The accused herein, Thomas and McClellan, were tried in common by general court-martial. Separate charges against the pair alleged the offenses of conspiracy to commit rape, rape, and lewd and lascivious conduct, in violation of Articles 81, 120, and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 881, S20, and 934, respectively. Upon arraignment, both men entered pleas of not guilty. Each was acquitted of rape, but the court-martial found them guilty of attempted rape, contrary to Article 80 of the Uniform Code, 10 USC § 880, and likewise convicted them of…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- People v. JaffeNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- People v. . MoranNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- People v. . JaffeNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Commonwealth v. TibbettsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
- Hicks v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1889
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- United States v. Philip Berrigan, in No. 72-1938, and Elizabeth McAlister Appeal of Elizabeth McAlister InCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Everett, GeorgeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- United States v. ByrdUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
- United States v. CurtisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
- People v. ThousandMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.