Legal Opinion

United States v. Tatum

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided April 27, 1992No. NMCM 91 1141PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REED, Judge:

Appellant was tried on 23 May and 17-21 July 1990 by a general court-martial, with members. Consistent with his not guilty pleas, appellant was acquitted of one speci*1116fication of rape (Charge I), one specification of carnal knowledge (Charge I), three specifications of sodomy (Charge II), two specifications of assault (Charge III), and one specification of indecent assault (Charge IV), in violation of Uniform Code of Military Justice [hereinafter UCMJ], Articles 120, 125, 128, and 134, 10 U.S.C. §§ 920, 925, 928, and 934. Contrary to his pleas, he was found guilty of one…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. SadinskyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
  2. United States v. RobertsU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1991

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. MosleyU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1992
  2. United States v. BulgerU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1993
  3. United States v. AndersonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993
  4. United States v. BulgerU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1993
  5. United States v. BulgerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API