Legal Opinion
Lauderbaugh v. Hopewell Township
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 11, 2003No. 01-4048PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ROTH, Circuit Judge.
Denise Lauderbaugh wants to install her manufactured mobile home, which complies with standards established by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), in the “R-2” residential district in the town of Hopewell. The HUD standards were created by the National Manufactured Housing Construction and Safety Standards Act (NMHCSSA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 5401-5426, an act that prohibits municipalities from imposing construction and safety standards on manufactured homes that differ from the federal standards.1 Hopewell has prohibited Lauder-*571baugh from…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Sameric Corporation Of Delaware, Inc. v. City Of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Peachlum v. City Of YorkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Geneva College v. SebeliusDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- Peachlum v. City of York PACourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Synagro-WWT, Inc. v. RUSH TP., PENNSYLVANIADistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
- Ethan Michael, Inc. v. Union TownshipCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.