Legal Opinion
Peachlum v. City of York PA
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided June 19, 2003No. 02-2977PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ROSENN, Circuit Judge.
This appeal primarily concerns the ripeness of facial and as-applied First Amendment challenges to a municipal ordinance regulating the size, content, and appearance of lawn signs in residential districts. 1 Sybil Peachlum sued the City of York, Pennsylvania, for declaratory and injunc-tive relief and damages for attempting to bar her from posting a freestanding 3-^ foot by 5 foot sign in her front yard. The sign depicted an anthropomorphized peach holding a newspaper with the headline: “Peachy News. Jesus is Alive.” Neon lights, frequently…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Peachlum v. City Of YorkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Conchatta Inc. v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- Geneva College v. SebeliusDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- Beverly Ohntrup v. Makina Ve Kimya Endustrisi KurCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- Strozyk v. Norfolk Southern Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.