Legal Opinion
Ethan Michael, Inc. v. Union Township
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 17, 2004No. 03-4090UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BARRY, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff claims that its procedural due process rights were violated by the process used to review its land use application, and argues that the District Court erred in dismissing that claim as unripe. In reviewing, as we do here, the grant of a motion to dismiss, we accept all allegations of the complaint as true, attribute all reasonable inferences in favor of the plaintiff, and affirm only if it appears that the plaintiff could prove no set of facts that would entitle it to relief. Alston v. Parker, 363 F.3d 229, 233 (3d Cir.2004) (citing Nami v. Fauver, 82…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Concrete Pipe & Products of Cal., Inc. v. Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Alston v. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Nami v. FauverCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- GAGE v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTIONDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022
- HE Group, Inc. v. Borough of MiddletownDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
- PRIKIS v. MAXATAWNY TOWNSHIPDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024