Legal Opinion
Woodruff v. Heiser
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 11, 1945No. 3052PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRATTON, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment allowing a claim in bankruptcy. A brief statement of the background may be helpful in understanding the manner in which the questions for determination arise. In 1935, M. E. Heiser sued Leonard J. Wood-ruff and others in the United States Coun for Southern California. It was alleged in the complaint that plaintiff had been and was engaged in the business of mining and marketing raw gems, particularly emeralds, sapphires, and zircons; that in 1928, he arrived in the United States from Australia on a business trip to find and establish a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pepper v. LittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Kelley v. Everglades Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Mayo v. Lakeland Highlands Canning Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Prudence Realization Corp. v. GeistSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Jackson v. HeiserCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Heiser v. WoodruffSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Earl Rader v. J. Marvin BoydCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
- Meléndez Arroyo v. Metro Taxicabs, Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1948
- In Re BurchDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1948
- Varela Padilla v. Fuentes RolónSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1950
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.