Legal Opinion
Jackson v. Heiser
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 30, 1940No. 9356PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MATHEWS, Circuit Judge.
This appeal is from (1) an order which, on June 29, 1939, refused to modify a default judgment in - an action for damages for conversion of property-and (2) an order which, on September 26, 1939, denied a motion to vacate the judgment, set aside the entry of default and permit answers to be filed.
The action was brought by appellee, M. E. Heiser, against Leonard Wood-ruff and others in the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of California. Appellee is a British subject. Woodruff is a citizen of California and a resident of the Southern District…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Stevirmac Oil & Gas Co. v. DittmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Rust v. United Waterworks Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1895
- Bensen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
- Republic Supply Co. v. Richfield Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
3Cited by25 opinions
- Heiser v. WoodruffSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Fong v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Iraola & CIA, S.A. v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
- Preston v. DenkinsArizona Supreme Court · 1963
- De Korwin v. First Nat. Bank of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1946
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.