Legal Opinion

Conlin v. Blanchard

California Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1933No. Docket No. L.A. 13733PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

A hearing was granted in this case after decision by the District Court of Appeal, First Appellate District, Division Two. Upon further consideration, we are satisfied that said court has correctly determined the issues, and we therefore adopt the following portion of the opinion of Mr. Presiding Justice Nourse, as the opinion of this court:

“Plaintiffs brought two actions in ejectment. The defendant Clutter intervened in the first and filed a cross-complaint in the second, claiming title to the real propery involved. Plaintiffs demandéd a trial by jury, which the court denied. Trial…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Follette v. Pacific Light & Power Corp.California Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Garrison v. BlanchardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. In Re the Estate of ParsellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Swallow v. Tungsten Products Co.California Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Anglo California Trust Co. v. KelleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Estate of WiseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Oliver v. the Swiss Club TellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. Boyd v. LancasterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  4. People v. VasilyanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. Walter v. National Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1970

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API