Anglo California Trust Co. v. Kelley
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
GRAY, J., pro tem.
This appeal from a judgment on the pleadings, quieting respondent’s title to certain real property presents for decision the sole question: Does the answer state a defense? If it does not, the judgment is correct. (Ham-man v. Milne, 179 Cal. 634 [178 Pac. 523]; White v. Jacobs, 204 Cal. 334 [267 Pac. 1087].) A brief summary of the essential allegations of the complaint and answer suffices for a determination of this question. The sufficiency of the answer is to be measured in the light of the following rules: Every affirmative allegation of the answer must be deemed true…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Lady Washington Consolidated Co. v. WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Bacon v. BaconCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. California Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- Sohler v. SohlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Lake v. BonyngeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bennett v. Hibernia BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Brictson v. WoodroughCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1947
- Wilson v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Sternbeck v. BuckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Smith v. BusniewskiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.