Legal Opinion

Anglo California Trust Co. v. Kelley

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 28, 1931No. Docket No. 7865PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, J., pro tem.

This appeal from a judgment on the pleadings, quieting respondent’s title to certain real property presents for decision the sole question: Does the answer state a defense? If it does not, the judgment is correct. (Ham-man v. Milne, 179 Cal. 634 [178 Pac. 523]; White v. Jacobs, 204 Cal. 334 [267 Pac. 1087].) A brief summary of the essential allegations of the complaint and answer suffices for a determination of this question. The sufficiency of the answer is to be measured in the light of the following rules: Every affirmative allegation of the answer must be deemed true…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Lady Washington Consolidated Co. v. WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Bacon v. BaconCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. California Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Sohler v. SohlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Lake v. BonyngeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bennett v. Hibernia BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Brictson v. WoodroughCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1947
  3. Wilson v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Sternbeck v. BuckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Smith v. BusniewskiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API