Legal Opinion
Hay v. Mason
California Supreme Court
Decided January 21, 1904No. L.A. No. 1403PublishedCited by 6 opinions
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order denying a new trial. M. T. Allen, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
COOPER, C.
This action was brought to recover damages for breach of contract to convey real estate. The case was tried before the court, findings filed, and judgment entered for defendant. This appeal is from the judgment and the order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial.
On November 19, 1901, defendant executed and delivered to plaintiffs a writing, of which the following is a copy, to wit:— “option to trade.
“For value received I hereby agree to sell and convey to Hay & Van Vranken, or his assigns, by a good and sufficient deed of grant, bargain and sale, with the usual covenants free…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Marsh v. LottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
- Bird v. PotterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Gosnell v. LloydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Converse v. FongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Nason v. LingleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.