Legal Opinion

Town of Greenwich v. Kristoff

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 13, 1980PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBogdanski, J.

In November of 1974, the plaintiffs, the town of Greenwich and Maurice F. Roddy, the town’s zoning enforcement officer, brought an action seeking to enjoin the defendant from using his premises as a rooming house on the ground that such use violated the Greenwich zoning regulations. By way of a special defense, the defendant alleged that his use of the premises in question constituted a valid, nonconforming use under the Greenwich building zone regulations. After a trial, the court refused to issue an injunction “in order that the defendant may be permitted to apply for a change of use.” From…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bianco v. Town of DarienSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
  2. Country Lands, Inc. v. SwinnertonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
  3. Town of Waterford v. GrabnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Simko v. ErvinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  2. Gelinas v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  3. O & G Industries, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  4. Loulis v. ParrottSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  5. Town of Greenwich v. KristoffConnecticut Appellate Court · 1984

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API