Legal Opinion

Town of Waterford v. Grabner

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 20, 1967PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlcorn, J.

For a number of years, the defendants have been engaged in the business of selling and processing sand and gravel from property owned by them in Waterford. The plaintiff town and George T. Phillips, the town’s building inspector, brought this action seeking to enjoin the operations of the defendants until they complied with a provision of the Waterford zoning ordinance regulating the operation of sand and gravel pits. To this complaint the defendants pleaded, inter alia, that they were making a valid nonconforming use of their property and that the regulation in issue was unreasonable,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Goldblatt v. Town of HempsteadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Town of Lebanon v. WoodsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
  3. Crowell v. PalmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
  4. Kyser v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
  5. Culinary Institute of America, Inc. v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Appliances, Inc. v. YostSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  2. Moore v. SerafinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  3. Berin v. OlsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  4. Hawaii Public Employment Relations Board v. United Public Workers, Local 646Hawaii Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Town of Greenwich v. KristoffSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API