Hall v. Chicago, Burlington & Northern Railroad
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Ramsey county, Wilkin, J., presiding, refusing a new trial on plaintiff consenting that the verdict (of $40,133.33) be reduced to $25,000.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
This was an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff while in defendant’s service as a locomotive engineer of a passenger train. The injuries were the result of a collision between plaintiff’s train and some freight-cars on defendant’s main track, between Dayton’s Bluff and Oakland station; and a somewhat full statement of the facts is necessary to a proper understanding of the case. The plaintiff was employed in running the regular suburban passenger train between the Union Depot, in St. Paul, and Pullman avenue, a distance of 10.18 miles, *441the first station…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pennsylvania Co. v. RoneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
- Craig v. CookSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
- Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. ParkerIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
- Locke v. S. C. & P. R. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1877
3Cited by23 opinions
- Goss v. GossSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Atchison, T. & SF Ry. Co. v. BallardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940
- Burch v. Southern Pacific Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1909
- Clay v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Cooper v. St. Paul City Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.