Legal Opinion

Hall v. Chicago, Burlington & Northern Railroad

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 1, 1891PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Ramsey county, Wilkin, J., presiding, refusing a new trial on plaintiff consenting that the verdict (of $40,133.33) be reduced to $25,000.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

This was an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff while in defendant’s service as a locomotive engineer of a passenger train. The injuries were the result of a collision between plaintiff’s train and some freight-cars on defendant’s main track, between Dayton’s Bluff and Oakland station; and a somewhat full statement of the facts is necessary to a proper understanding of the case. The plaintiff was employed in running the regular suburban passenger train between the Union Depot, in St. Paul, and Pullman avenue, a distance of 10.18 miles, *441the first station…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Co. v. RoneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Craig v. CookSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
  3. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. ParkerIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Locke v. S. C. & P. R. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1877

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Goss v. GossSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  2. Atchison, T. & SF Ry. Co. v. BallardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940
  3. Burch v. Southern Pacific Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Clay v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  5. Cooper v. St. Paul City Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1893

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API