Legal Opinion

Kelly v. Southern Minnesota Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 2, 1881PublishedCited by 45 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Faribault county, Dickinson, J., presiding, refusing a new trial.

1Opinion of the Court

Mitchell, J.*

This is an action for damages, for injuries to plaintiff’s horse, caused by the alleged negligence of defendant, in failing and neglecting to maintain and keep in a safe condition a crossing where defendant’s railroad intersected a highway. The negligence complained of was that a plank, which should have been kept fastened next to and along-side of the iron rail, had been torn up and removed, thus leaving a space or hole between the surface of the highway and the railroad track, into which the foot of plaintiff’s horse was caught and injured while being driven on the highway over…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mahoney v. Metropolitan RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  2. Phelps v. City of MankatoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
  3. Webb v. Portland & Kennebec RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1869
  4. Lyman v. Inhabitants of AmherstMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  5. O'Leary v. City of MankatoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1874

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Morse v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
  2. Edgington ex rel. Meyer v. Burlington, Cedar Rapids & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  3. Hartmon v. National Heater Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  4. Carson v. City of GeneseeIdaho Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. PhillipsIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API