Legal Opinion

Noerr Motor Freight Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 17, 1956No. Appeals, Nos. 120, 143, 144 and 158PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rhodes, P. J.,

These four appeals, taken by protestant motor carriers, are from the order, of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission of March 14,1955, as supplemented by its order of February 14; 1956, granting an extension in operating territory to applicant, Joseph R' Prostko, trading and- doing business as Altoona-Pittsburgh Freight Line, on his application of July 31,. 1953. *325The matter ivas previously before us on appeal from the original order. After argument and reargument we remanded the record to the commission for clarification of that order, and to make sufficient…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Hertz Drivurself Stations, Inc. v. SigginsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  2. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie Railroad v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  3. Aizen v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  4. Zurcher v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  5. Moderm Trans. Co. v. Pa. Pub. Util. Com.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. Modern Transfer Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Reeder v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  4. Pennsylvania Railroad v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  5. D. F. Bast, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API