Legal Opinion

D. F. Bast, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 21, 1958No. Appeals, Nos. 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 239PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Wright, J.,

On May 15, 1956, Bob Young Trucking, Inc., a certificated common carrier, applied to the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission for an amendment to its existing certificate seeking authority “to transport as a Class D carrier all types and forms of steel and metal articles from the City of Bethlehem to points in Pennsylvania”. Protests were filed by a number of other certificated common carriers. After taking extensive testimony at hearings on June 25, September 4 and 5, and October 15, 1956, the Commission, by short form order dated April 15, 1957, amended the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie Railroad v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  2. Zurcher v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. Bridgewater Borough v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. Cage v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. Garner v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. D. F. Bast, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Bermensolo v. Tennyson Transfer & Storage Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Application of BermensoloIdaho Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Snyder v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  5. Weston Hauling, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API