Wight v. Shelby Railroad
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
ERROR TO SHELBY CIRCUIT. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion of the Court. Rep.
1Opinion of the Court
Judge Simpson
delivered the opinion of the Court.
As the same questions are involved in both of these cases, and as the validity of the defense presented in both, has to be examined in each case, we will proceed to consider and decide such questions as arise upon the record in either case.
The defense relied upon by Wight, that the subscription of stock made by him, was left with one of the commissioners in the nature of an escrow, is wholly invalid. The commissioners were the persons appointed by the charter to receive and accept subscriptions of stock. A subscription received by them, even if…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hughes v. Bank of SomersetCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1824
3Cited by33 opinions
- Schroeder v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Dean v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1876
- Tinkler v. SwaynieIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Callanan v. JuddWisconsin Supreme Court · 1868
- Castleman-Blakemore Co. v. Pickrell & Craig Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.