Legal Opinion

Rucker v. Steelman

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1881No. 7512PublishedCited by 57 opinions

From the Clark Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

— The appellee’s complaint against appellant is for the recovery of the possession of real estate, and is in the ordinary form. The answer of the appellant is in three paragraphs:

The first is a general denial.

The second and third set up affirmative defences by way of counter-claim.

Demurrers were sustained to the second and third paragraphs, and we are required, by the assignment of errors and the brief of counsel, to consider the questions presented by these rulings.

The material allegations of the second paragraph, exhibited in a condensed form, are substantially these : On the 21st day of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Pursley v. HayesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1867
  2. Splahn v. GillespieIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Johnston v. GlancyIndiana Supreme Court · 1835
  4. Peck v. . MallamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
  5. Tinkler v. SwaynieIndiana Supreme Court · 1880

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Felton v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  2. State v. Portsmouth Savings BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Warner v. MarshallIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Robertson v. Van CleaveIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Scheible v. SlagleIndiana Supreme Court · 1883

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API