Legal Opinion

Davis v. Hardy

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1881No. 8006PublishedCited by 45 opinions

From the Hamilton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWoods, J.

The appellee obtained against the appellant and others a decree of foreclosure of a mortgage upon real estate. The errors assigned are, the overruling of the appellant’s motion for a new trial, and that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against the appellant.

The complaint shows the execution of the note and mortgage by Joel C. Jackson, payable to the order of N. F. Dunn; endorsements by Dunn to Daniel Fisher, and by Fisher to the appellee; the conveyance of the mortgaged land by Jackson and wife to Ransom Edwards, who, in part payment for the land,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Garfield v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. McDill v. GunnIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Josselyn v. EdwardsIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Tinkler v. SwaynieIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Bristol Milling & Manufacturing Co. v. ProbascoIndiana Supreme Court · 1878

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Hauk v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Union Mutual Life Insurance v. BuchananIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Boswell v. LyonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Rogers v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. SteinIndiana Supreme Court · 1892

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API