Legal Opinion

Young v. Dille

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1923No. 17774PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

This is an action brought by the appellant Young against the defendant Dille and the respondents Lee Harris and Union Oil Company, to recover in damages for injuries to his person 'and property. The appellant divided his complaint into two separate causes of action. As against the defendant Dille, he set forth the facts thought to charge him with liability in the following language:

“That heretofore on to-wit the 3rd day of January, 1922, at the hour of about 8:30 o’clock in the forenoon of said day, plaintiff was driving an automobile in a southerly direction along and upon South ‘L’ Street…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rochester v. Seattle, Renton & Southern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Seattle-First National Bank v. Shoreline Concrete Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Arthur A. Johnson Corp. v. Indemnity InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
  3. Bost v. . MetcalfeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  4. Kalinowski v. Y.W.C.A.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Smith v. RodeneWashington Supreme Court · 1966

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API