Legal Opinion
Parr v. Ebrahimian
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 31, 2011No. Civil Action 07-1718 (PLF)PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on two separate motions to dismiss, one filed by defendants Timothy Walker and the Walker Group, LLC (“the Walker Defendants”), and the other by defendants Mashaallah Ebrahimian and Rimcor, LLC (“the Rim-cor Defendants”). After consideration of the parties’ arguments, the relevant legal authorities, and the entire record in this case, the Court will grant both motions in part and deny them in part.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Keely D. Parr, proceeding pro se, alleges the following in her amended complaint: In 2006 defendant…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Floyd v. Office of Representative Sheila Jackson LeeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Abdelrhman v. AckermanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- Jacobson v. HofgardDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Campbell v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- EIG Energy Fund XIV, L.P. v. Petróleo Brasileiro S.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.