Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Pipa v. Kemberling

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 27, 1937No. Appeal, 234PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Stern,

In accordance with the provisions of section 907 of the Administrative Code of 1929, P. L. 177, the President Judge of Snyder County requested the Attorney General of Pennsylvania to retain and employ an attorney to represent the Commonwealth in the prosecution of certain persons charged with being accessories before the fact to a murder committed in that county. The Attorney General complied by designating plaintiff for that purpose; in the order making the appointment he stated that “Mr. Pipa will receive such compensation from the County of Snyder as shall…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Minerd v. MargiottiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Commonwealth v. CurrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  3. Commonwealth v. LehmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  4. Werner v. KingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  5. Commissioners v. HallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1838

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gwinn v. KaneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Kingston Boro. v. KalanoskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. Commonwealth v. MilanoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Club Liquor License QuotaPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1939
  5. Eshback v. Martin, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Pike County1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API