Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Lehman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 26, 1932No. Appeal, 297PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Linn,

The first subject of complaint is that the court erred “in requesting the attorney general to appoint a special prosecutor to conduct the prosecution,” and in permitting the appointee to “try the indictment against the appellant as counsel for the Commonwealth, because the request and appointment were not authorized by section 907 of the Act of April 9, 1929, article IX, P. L. 177, 239,” 71 PS, page 108, section 297.

The point is without merit, if we assume, without deciding, that it may be made by defendant. We note, first, that appellant made no objection until…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ParkerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  2. Commonwealth v. GardnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  3. Commonwealth v. DeitrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  4. Commonwealth v. McHaleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1881
  5. Commonwealth v. StalloneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Matson v. MargiottiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  2. Commonwealth v. TurzaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Commonwealth v. FugmannSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Minerd v. MargiottiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. Dauphin County Grand Jury Investigation ProceedingsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API