Legal Opinion
Kingston Boro. v. Kalanosky
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 8, 1944No. Appeal, 43PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
James, J.,
The Borough of Kingston filed a bill in equity to enjoin John Kalanosky and Mary Kalanosky from the operation of a retail beer dispensing business upon premises owned by the defendants, averring that the premises were located within the General Residence (TJ5) Districts as provided under a zoning ordinance duly enacted and approved on December 3, 1928. Defendants filed preliminary objections to the bill, which raised two main questions: (1) that the act of June 29, 1923, P. L. 957, 53 P. S. See. 15731, under which the zoning ordinance was adopted, was repealed by the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Taylor v. MooreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Baker v. KirschnekSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Naffah v. City Deposit BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Williams v. Lumbermen's InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Oriole's Liquor License CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Sawdey Liquor License CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Com., Dept. of Ed. v. First SchoolSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. JannettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- United States Steel Co. v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- H. C. Frick Coke Co. AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.