Legal Opinion
Sterling v. Ourisman Chevrolet of Bowie Inc.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided May 2, 2013No. Case No. PWG-12-3193PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PAUL W. GRIMM, District Judge.
This Memorandum Opinion addresses the Motion to Dismiss that Defendants Ourisman Chevrolet of Bowie, Inc., Henry Hylton, William Taliaferro, and Lew Gilinsky filed, ECF No. 5; Plaintiff Monica Sterling’s Opposition, ECF No. 12; and Defendants’ Reply, ECF No. 14. A hearing is not necessary. See Loe. R. 105.6. For the reasons stated herein, Defendant’s Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Defendants must file their Answers no later than May 16, 2013, at which time the Court will enter a Scheduling Order and schedule a Rule 16 conference…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Bey v. Shapiro Brown & Alt, LLPDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2014
- Boardley v. Household Finance Corp. IIIDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2014
- Webster v. ACB Receivables Management, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2014
- Jackson v. SagalDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2019
- Bhari Information Technology System Private Ltd. v. SriramDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.