Legal Opinion
Boardley v. Household Finance Corp. III
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided August 14, 2014No. Case No. PWG-12-3009PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PAUL W. GRIMM, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Eurkert Boardley and Senta Boardley, who believe that Defendants Household Finance Corp. Ill (“Household”) and HSBC Holdings Inc., pic (“HSBC”)” lured them in through bait and switch tactics, entered into a loan agreement with Defendants with higher monthly payments than Plaintiffs believed they could afford, on the understanding that they soon could refinance for a lower monthly amount. After years of deferments, attempted refinancing, over $60,000 in payments made, and what Plaintiffs characterize as misrepresentations by…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Ayres v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2015
- Sutton v. CitiMortgage, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Maurice Glenn v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
- Anne M. McFadden, Jeffrey McFadden, and CapFin Realty, LLC v. M&T BankDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2026
- Bailey v. PHH Mortgage CorporationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2021
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.