Rockhill v. Parker
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
Plaintiff filed her complaint in the usual form to quiet title to the southeast quarter of a section of land situated in Imperial County. Defendant Parker filed an answer and cross-complaint whereby he disclaimed any interest in the west half of said quarter section, but alleged that under and by virtue of a contract he claimed the east half thereof adversely .to plaintiff, in whom the legal title was vested, and in effect asked for a decree of specific performance requiring Her to execute a deed conveying the same to him in accordance with her contract so to do. Judgment went for defendant…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dickerson v. ColgroveSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Glass v. HulbertMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- Moore v. CoppCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Donahue v. MeisterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Crocker v. CarpenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Monarco v. Lo GrecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Dunham, Carrigan & Hayden Co. v. Thermoid Rubber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
- Frank v. TavaresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Schaefer v. United Bank & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
- Monarco v. Lo GrecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.