Legal Opinion

Frank v. Tavares

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 28, 1956No. Civ. 8724PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McMURRAY, J. pro tem. *

A jury returned verdicts in favor of Manuel Frank, as administrator of the estate of Elsie Tavares Frank, his deceased wife, in the sum of $11,925 and in favor of Paul Hornung, a friend of the deceased Elsie Frank, in the sum of $3,075. Maria Tavares, the mother of Elsie, appeals from the verdicts against her and from a judgment rendered by the court which adopted these verdicts.

In 1948 Paul Hornung gave Elsie Frank approximately $25,000 with which to build and furnish a house upon the understanding that she would provide him with a home and nursing care for the rest of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sears v. RuleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Lee v. HensleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  3. Fleishman v. WoodsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Knapp v. KnappCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Aguirre v. AlexanderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lectrodryer v. SeoulBankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  2. Dinosaur Development, Inc. v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  3. Allen v. PowellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Richland County v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Maddox v. RainoldiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API