Legal Opinion

Schaefer v. United Bank & Trust Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 21, 1930No. Docket No. 4025PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMISON, J., pro tem.

This case was tried by the court without a jury, the court denying appellant’s request for a jury. Judgment was rendered in favor of respondents and from the judgment appellant has appealed.

In substance the facts are as follows: In the spring of 1927, two corporations, the United Bank and Trust Company of California and the French-American Bank were merged under the name of United Bank and Trust Company. At the time of this merger it was agreed by the stockholders of the two corporations first named that upon the surrender to the United Bank and Trust Company of the stock…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Glock v. Howard & Wilson Colony Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Central Savings Bank of Oakland v. LakeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Fish v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Coulter Dry Goods Co. v. WentworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Pomeroy v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gregory v. HamiltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  2. Hastings v. MatlockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  3. Walton v. WaltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  4. Nicolds v. StorchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  5. Patel v. LIEBERMENSCHCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API