Slentz v. Western Bank Note & Engraving Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Pennsylvania. Action by Andrew Slentz against the Western Bank Note & Engraving Company of Chicago, Ill. There was a verdict for plaintiff, and' a judgment for defendant notwithstanding the verdict, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.
In the court below Andrew Slentz obtained a verdict for personal injuries against the Western Bank Note & Engraving Company. The defendant on the trial asked the court to charge that “under the pleadings and all' the evidence the verdict must be for the defendant,” and, the verdict being in favor of the plaintiff, it subsequently moved the court to enter judgment in its favor non obstante veredicto. Such motion was granted, and, judgment being entered, plaintiff sued out this writ and assigned for error such entry.
■After a careful examination of the proofs, we are of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Railroad Co. v. StoutSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Ernst v. . Hudson River Railroad Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1866
- Dalmas v. KembleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
- Northern Pacific Railroad v. AmatoSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Oldenburg v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- F. W. Woolworth Co. v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
- Bird v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928
- Iowa Cent. Ry. Co. v. WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1919
- Albright v. Pennsylvania R.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1936
- McLaughlin v. Joseph Horne Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.