Legal Opinion

Bird v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 12, 1928No. 5067-5090PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIETRICH, Circuit Judge.

The above-entitled case and 23 others, numbered consecutively from 5067 to 5090, inclusive, are of like general character and have been submitted together, though upon separate records. They are all brought under the provisions of the Act of June 7, 1924 (43 Stat. 595 [28 USCA § 52]), conferring upon the United States District Court for- the Northern District of California jurisdiction “to hear and determine the claims of American citizens, their heirs and legal representatives, for damages or loss occasioned by or resulting from the seizure, detention, sale, or…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Railroad Co. v. StoutSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Law v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Olson v. Southern Surety Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  4. Slentz v. Western Bank Note & Engraving Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1910
  5. Whitelaw v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. H. Liebes & Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
  2. Carbone v. Ursich the Del RioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
  3. Dillon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928
  4. Cub Fork Coal Co. v. Fairmount Glass WorksCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1932
  5. United States v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API