Legal Opinion

F. W. Woolworth Co. v. Davis

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 6, 1930No. 187PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDERMOTT, Circuit Judge.

The appellee, plaintiff below, recovered a judgment for injuries received from a fall down an elevator shaft in his employer’s place of business. Several errors are assigned.

I. It is claimed that there was error in the overruling of defendant’s special plea to the jurisdiction, which1 presented the proposition that the injury was compensable only under the Workmen’s Compensation Laws of the state of Oklahoma. The state compensation statute provides that the remedies therein provided for shall be exclusive in cases where the statute applies. The statute provides:

“Compen…

2Cases cited91 opinions

  1. Improvement Company v. MunsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Brasfield v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Slocum v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. GoodmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. Pleasants v. FantSupreme Court of the United States · 1875

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Elzig v. GudwangenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
  2. Nicolay v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
  3. Diederich v. American News Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
  4. United States v. PerryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  5. United States v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API