Legal Opinion
Schroeder v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 17, 2015No. A13-2289PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, Justice.
The question presented by this case is whether a person injured in an automobile *67accident may recover the reasonable value of household services under Minn.Stat. § 65B.44, subd. 5 (2014), if those services were not replaced or performed during the period of disability. We conclude that an injured person who has primary responsibility for care and maintenance of the household need not replace household services as a condition to recovering the reasonable value of such services. We therefore affirm.
Respondent Carmen Schroeder suffered a significant spinal injury in a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Johnson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Burkstrand v. BurkstrandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- Nadeau v. Austin Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Axelberg v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- West Bend Mutual Insurance Co. v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Angela Mary Lennartson, Katie FossSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- City of Oronoco v. Fitzpatrick Real Estate, LLC v. Whitney National Bank of New Orleans, LouisianaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- Phone Recovery Services, LLC v. Qwest Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- City of Golden Valley v. WiebesickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- Reagan West v. West Bend Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.