Axelberg v. Commissioner of Public Safety
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GILDEA, Chief Justice.
The question presented in this case is whether a person who has had his or her driver’s license revoked under Minnesota’s implied consent law may raise the common law affirmative defense of necessity in a civil implied consent hearing under Minn. Stat. § 169A.53, subd. 3 (2012). Because we conclude that the plain language of the statute does not permit a person to raise the affirmative defense of necessity at an implied consent hearing, we affirm.
*207This case arises out of a domestic assault incident that took place over Memorial Day weekend in 2011. Appellant…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Friedman v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- Prideaux v. State Dept. of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Heddan v. DirkswagerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Rohmiller v. HartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Schatz v. Interfaith Care CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- State of Minnesota v. Mahdi Hassan AliSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- State v. CarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- Schroeder v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- Sumner v. Jim Lupient InfinitiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- Back v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.