Legal Opinion

Axelberg v. Commissioner of Public Safety

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 21, 2014No. A12-1341PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GILDEA, Chief Justice.

The question presented in this case is whether a person who has had his or her driver’s license revoked under Minnesota’s implied consent law may raise the common law affirmative defense of necessity in a civil implied consent hearing under Minn. Stat. § 169A.53, subd. 3 (2012). Because we conclude that the plain language of the statute does not permit a person to raise the affirmative defense of necessity at an implied consent hearing, we affirm.

*207This case arises out of a domestic assault incident that took place over Memorial Day weekend in 2011. Appellant…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Friedman v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  2. Prideaux v. State Dept. of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  3. Heddan v. DirkswagerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  4. Rohmiller v. HartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  5. Schatz v. Interfaith Care CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. State of Minnesota v. Mahdi Hassan AliSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
  2. State v. CarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
  3. Schroeder v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  4. Sumner v. Jim Lupient InfinitiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  5. Back v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API