Legal Opinion

City of Golden Valley v. Wiebesick

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 19, 2017No. A15-1795Published

1Dissent 1

DISSENT

2Dissent · AndersonAnderson, Justice

Today, the court holds that, so long as the city has a reasonable standard for choosing the homes to be searched, city officials can search a home without any suspicion of wrongdoing. The Supreme Court of the United States has held that similar searches do not violate the Fourth Amendment. Camara v. Mun. Court, 387 U.S. 523, 87 S.Ct. 1727, 18 L.Ed.2d 930 (1967). The court recognizes that Minnesotans also are protected by Article I, Section 10 of the Minnesota Constitution, but it concludes that our constitution provides no more protection than the Fourth Amendment.

Because I conclude…

3Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API