Legal Opinion

Mercantile Contract Purchase Corp. v. Melnick

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1970No. 260PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnor T. Hansen, J.

Appellants sought to intervene in this mortgage foreclosure action, claiming they had been assured by Melnicks and Kaminsky that the sum of $20,000 would release any mortgages and interest of Auto Acceptance in Parcel III. This assertion is based on a letter to that effect which Melnicks produced at the time the land contract was executed and was from Auto Acceptance, signed by Harry W. Kaminsky and addressed to Stanley Melnick. Appellants allege they relied upon this representation and suffered damages in the amount of $30,000, representing their present equity. The appellants argue they…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. City of Wauwatosa v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Scanlon v. City of MenashaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Bump v. DahlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Coe v. ManseauWisconsin Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Herro v. Wisconsin Federal Surplus Property Development Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Belleville State Bank v. SteeleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Wisconsin Finance Corp. v. GarlockCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987
  3. Badger State Agri-Credit & Realty, Inc. v. LubahnCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985
  4. Kornitz v. Commonwealth Land Title InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  5. St. Francis Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Hearthside Homes, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API