Herro v. Wisconsin Federal Surplus Property Development Corp.

The appeal presents the following issues:(1) Are the allegations of the amended complaint, that Bong Corporation acted as agent for certain respondents, deemed admitted for purposes of testing the sufficiency of the complaint;(2) Does sec. 285.10, Stats., authorize joinder of the state in this action;(3) Does the trial court have jurisdiction over the persons of all respondents despite the sovereign immunity provision of art. IV, sec. 27, of the Wisconsin Constitution ;(4) Are any of the respondents bound by appellant’s agreement with Bong Corporation;(5) Does the complaint state a cause of…